Welcome... This is my little blog about stuff related to photography or around the subject of photography. I like to tinker with things as well as learning things to help me be a better photographer or better tinkerer? In this spot you will see some of my experiments and projects as well I'm sure some mishaps or outright failures. I hope you find here something that is interesting to you and drop me a note. Remember, I'm not an actual photographer nor have I played one on television.
About Me
- MysteryOnion
- Questions, but don't want others to see? Sure, send me an email... please, only questions about the content. Yes, complaints too. Yes, I know, my picture... I look like I'm dead... very sick at the time and I hate having my picture taken. mysteryonion@gmail.com
Popular Posts
-
Two broken or not working ME Supers... I will have to get on with the job and document and CLA both of them soon. For my repair pals that...
-
...so while they hang up and dry, I'll put up the last of the opening desolders. We are almost to the point of removing the face. ...
-
SURVEY: Should I move these ME Super Project notes to a separate blog? This was suggested by a rare write-in viewer. So, how do you ...
-
So the next bit is the "Relay P. C." This part is connected to the speed buttons. The required first thing is to remove the t...
-
A question from "Mike"... Inside a 67 200mm f4.0... sad thing is that I don't have one yet... however, we can at least get...
-
This is the thing... I started with the camera with the fewer symptoms and hope that once the problems are fixed that it will be closed up...
-
A closer look at the "Winding Guide Plate Assembly"... Indicated is what was corrected. The function it provides is to move, ...
-
One out of three... Although the service manual indicates removing the three wires, I opt to only do the one gray wire on the right as n...
-
So with some coaxing the face of it falls off. As you can see, busy in there. Camera 1 will be just a basic gooey bumper and some clea...
-
to orient, we are looking from the front just over the strap lug of the crank side. Not critical to the operation of the camera, but a ...
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Could this be an improved 40mm?
A couple of test so far of the Pentax M 40mm 2.8 has shown much better image quality than I remember. Maybe not using it for more than three years and I forget the image quality... I did a head to head test against my DA 16-45 and set to 40mm on the K20D. I seems the sharpness goes in favor to the pancake. I might guess that the lpmm is around 70 at center and 65 at the corners although that is hard to tell with a digital. I don't have absolute specs to the proper thickness of the cement or if my alignment is correct, but I recall it scoring around cent/corn at about 62/52 high to 52/44 low in lpmm. The color anomalies are also different now as well. It was a clear shift from blue and soft red to is more a dull red, a faint chromatic aberration at the corners now and that is less noticeable overall. So it looks like something wrong was right. The only concern is if the cement has not fully dried, will this stay this good and improve over time or will it get crappy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment