So it does work, however, the need to manual focus on a non-aided screen is a limiting factor. When I get the focus right... sharp... YES... SHARP, but when the focus was slightly off... eheww. I also tested the newly fixed 6x7 300mm/f4 and on an APS-C sensor that would be a very strong telephoto much like a 450 on a 35mm camera. So at 100 plus feet and if I hold steady enough, I could almost make out 16 point fonts.
The main lenses were the 105mm/f2.4 and a few with the 165mm/2.8 and both did well, but the 105 was the one I mostly used. It allowed me to shoot at 640-800 iso and at speeds 1/20-1/50 with the SR (shake-reduction). The 300mm required 800-1600 ISO unfortunately as so the noise savings was lost on it, however, the super close view makes up for the noise. Now all this should be compared to the previous method for covering these shots: 16-45mm at f4 which would require ISOs in the 1000-2000 range and forcing me to shoot wide-open all the time. This would mean a sharp center of about a sixth of the image area. Testing the pixels from the recent shoot yield high sharpness almost all around and almost to the corners.
Welcome... This is my little blog about stuff related to photography or around the subject of photography. I like to tinker with things as well as learning things to help me be a better photographer or better tinkerer? In this spot you will see some of my experiments and projects as well I'm sure some mishaps or outright failures. I hope you find here something that is interesting to you and drop me a note. Remember, I'm not an actual photographer nor have I played one on television.
About Me
- MysteryOnion
- Questions, but don't want others to see? Sure, send me an email... please, only questions about the content. Yes, complaints too. Yes, I know, my picture... I look like I'm dead... very sick at the time and I hate having my picture taken. mysteryonion@gmail.com
Popular Posts
-
Two broken or not working ME Supers... I will have to get on with the job and document and CLA both of them soon. For my repair pals that...
-
A question from "Mike"... Inside a 67 200mm f4.0... sad thing is that I don't have one yet... however, we can at least get...
-
Pick another one upe cheap... I think I have a better idea as to what I should try next. This is a pre-modified version or did they replace...
-
Hi, been out of touch for a while...illness. So, a recent appearance on the bay is this LX and maybe 2nd Gen or is it a 1st Gen in 2nd cl...
-
...so while they hang up and dry, I'll put up the last of the opening desolders. We are almost to the point of removing the face. ...
-
So with some coaxing the face of it falls off. As you can see, busy in there. Camera 1 will be just a basic gooey bumper and some clea...
-
to orient, we are looking from the front just over the strap lug of the crank side. Not critical to the operation of the camera, but a ...
-
SURVEY: Should I move these ME Super Project notes to a separate blog? This was suggested by a rare write-in viewer. So, how do you ...
-
Getting it done slowly... very slow. Light tight walls... that is not going well as I hoped. Actually, I have no walls just a wall and the...
-
Repeat of the Take-Up side Warning! If you are not fully familiar with the DIY repair of any camera, don't jump in without ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(18)
-
▼
December
(7)
- The Post Pentax 6X7 300mm Repair Round-Up.
- Harvesting the sweet spot... bumper crop!
- With the 67-K adapter in hand this is what I found...
- Harvesting the sweet spot... hoping to get the 67-...
- Some thing to say about the 6x7 adventures
- Plans grinding to a halt. Now the Takumar SMC 300...
- Coming! A 6x7 75mm...well with some hitches...
-
▼
December
(7)
No comments:
Post a Comment